PACG - Progressive Action for the Common Good
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Action Center
    • Take Action
    • Contact Your Government Officials
    • Reliable Sources of News
  • Events
    • Upcoming PACG Events
    • PACG Calendar
    • Community Events
  • Groups
    • PACG Book Club
    • What is an Issue Forum?
    • Civil Rights Forum
    • Environmental Forum
    • Gender Equity Forum
    • Health Care Reform Forum
  • Donate
    • Donate to PACG
    • Endowment >
      • Donate to the Dick Fallow Fund for Social Justice
      • Honoring Dick Fallow
      • Grant Application
  • Contact
    • About
    • Join Us
    • Sign Up for the Progressive Action Update
    • Make a Submission to the Progressive Action Update

What You Can Do Now - Educate Yourself About Health Care Choices

10/21/2019

0 Comments

 

Health Care Reform in 2019 and 2020

A Statement by the Health Care Reform Forum
(Note: This statement is downloadable at the link below. Also, see our Blog about signing up for Health Care Insurance.)

Summary of Points 
  • These points are the consensus position of the active members of the Health Care Reform Forum, not the official position of Progressive Action for the Common Good (PACG) or its membership.
  • We advocate retaining and building on the foundation of the Affordable Care Act (ACA).
  • We support eliminating efforts that have been made to weaken the ACA.
  • We support fixing the areas where the ACA has fallen short of its goals.
  • “Medicare for All” and “Single Payer” are confusing terms, and they are not necessarily synonymous. We summarize some of the ways in which they can differ.
  • Some understanding of health care systems in other countries is helpful in evaluating proposals for health system reform in this country. 
  • We support the following three next steps to strengthen the ACA:
    1. Adopt a publicly administered insurance plan to be offered on the marketplace.
    2. Require negotiated drug prices in publicly administered plans, including Medicare.
    3. Create a system for transparency in the pricing of provider services as well as of administrative costs in the private sector.
  • In any health care reform proposal, address the projected shortfall in the Medicare Hospital Insurance trust fund; this is especially important for advocates of expanding Medicare with some form of “Medicare for All.”
  • We believe that health care is a moral issue: its resources are finite, and health system reform entails all of us recognizing not only our rights, but also our responsibilities, individual and collective.
 
 
Disclaimer for Health Care Reform Forum Statement - August 3, 2019
The Health Care Reform Forum of PACG does not, and will not, endorse the proposal of any candidate, at either the federal or state level, for health care reform.  As we have done since our inception in 2005, we continue to advocate for the basic goal of access to quality, affordable, sustainable health care for everyone in this country.  Political proposals are the means to reach that goal.  That distinction having been made, our forum members have, after much discussion, reached our own conclusions about certain key issues in current health care reform discussions.  What follows is the consensus position of the active members of the Health Care Reform Forum, not an official position of Progressive Action for the Common Good as an organization or its broader membership.

 

PACG Health Care Reform Statement 2019-2020
 
Our forum has been discussing and advocating for health care reform for nearly 15 years.  We supported the Affordable Care Act (ACA) as an important step forward toward the goal of quality, sustainable, accessible, and affordable health care for all Americans. We believe that the best and most doable option, in the current political environment, is to retain and build on the foundation of the ACA, eliminate the efforts to weaken it by the current administration, and fix the areas where it has fallen short of its goals.  
 

Evaluating Health Care Reform Proposals of Congressional and Presidential Candidates
in the 2020 Election

 
“Medicare for all” has become a popular rallying call for health care reform.  But the concept has many different variations and definitions.
 
A “single payer” system is proposed by some candidates.  It would create a new health care insurance system run completely by federal government agencies and paid for by the government (i.e., by taxpayers). Everyone in America would be covered.  Standards of care and payments to doctors, hospitals, and other providers, as well as drug pricing, would be negotiated and regulated by the government.  Private insurance would be eliminated over a brief transition period of 2-3 years.  No one has yet come up with a credible, non-partisan estimate of the cost of, or implementation plan for, such a system, or proposed exactly how it would be paid for.
 
We fully acknowledge the appeal of a “single payer” approach to U.S. health care reform since it would quickly achieve universal coverage.  But to call it “Medicare for All” is misleading.
 
There are many flaws and injustices in the current U.S. “system,” even since the passage of the ACA.  Medical debt is still a major cause of personal bankruptcies, even for those with insurance.  Insurance and pharmaceutical companies, as well as some providers, make exorbitant profits, the costs of which are borne by customers and taxpayers.   Millions of people still lack coverage.  The list is long.  But a “single payer” plan is not the only option, and we have tried to give fair consideration to all proposals to improve the American health care system.
 
At least six other proposals have been made by legislators or candidates for president.  They all build on the basic foundation of the Affordable Care Act, and the existing programs of Medicare and Medicaid.  They would not eliminate private insurance companies.  Three proposals would create a new public option plan, based on Medicare, which would be offered to individuals and some (or all) employers through the ACA marketplace.  It would compete with the existing private insurance plans on the marketplace.  (A public option plan was to have been included in the ACA, butwas dropped due to resistance from insurance companies.)   
 
Two other proposals would allow some people to buy into the current Medicare or Medicaid plans.  All of these plans would expand insurance coverage for many more families, but not everyone.  Government subsidies would continue to help make insurance affordable for low income families.
 
It is unclear whether a single payer plan is practical and doable at the present time.  To rapidly eliminate all private insurance and build a new system, even though it would be based on Medicare, could lead to unimaginable chaos.  One simple question it raises:  how many insurance jobs would be lost?  Also, how would eliminating that sector of the economy affect the overall U.S. economy?  We have not seen any reliable estimates of such data.  Additionally, many patients and their families would lose their current good employer or union insurance.  Also, there needs to be a credible estimate of the costs and revenues needed to make it work before such a comprehensive program is adopted.  The respected Congressional Budget Office has yet to venture a cost estimate, but other experts predict it will be very expensive.  If so, a single payer plan is likely to be opposed by many Democrats as well as by Republicans.
 
We believe that the ACA has accomplished important improvements in our health care system, and note that public support has grown steadily since it was adopted.  Even those who want to repeal it have so far been unable to do so, and they have resorted to tactics to sabotage and weaken it.  Yet it is still supported by half (50%) of American adults, with a considerably smaller portion (38%) opposed (Kaiser Family Foundation Health Tracking Poll, April 2019)[1].  We think the best way forward is to build on the foundation of the ACA, fix its flaws, and improve its coverage of more and more families.
 
We also think that the term “Medicare for All” is misleading when equated with a single payer system.  At present, Medicare is available for most people over age 65.  But almost everyone pays a modest premium for hospital, doctor, and drug coverage. Also, patients covered by Medicare often pay deductibles and co-payments when they use the coverage. The government sets standards of care and payment to the providers, who are often chosen by the patients.  Medicare is forbidden to negotiate drug prices.  Many people choose to supplement their Medicare coverage with private insurance or to purchase private Medicare Advantage plans. Many of the aspects of Medicare listed in this paragraph are not included in single payer proposals, and thus using “single payer” and “Medicare for All” as synonyms is misleading and can be confusing.
Most developed countries have health insurance programs that cover everyone, with a large portion of that cost paid through taxation. We acknowledge that there are some similarities between systems elsewhere and the current U.S. Medicare system for most Americans over 65. But as Americans evaluate the various health care reforms being proposed, we believe it is important for them to know, for example, that systems in other countries also have various forms of complementary private health insurance, similar in some ways to the current Medicare supplement and Medicare Advantage private plans.  Evaluating proposals for U.S. health care system reform entails a certain amount of knowledge about such facts. 
 

Looking Ahead
We believe that the next step for reform should be the adoption of a publicly administered insurance plan to be offered on the ACA marketplace.  This would retain employer and union insurance and still
bring real competition to the insurance market.  A second reform should be negotiated drug prices in publicly administered plans, including Medicare.  A third reform should be the creation of a system for transparency in the pricing of provider services as well as of administrative costs in the private sector.  Besides directly benefitting consumers of health care resources, such transparency is essential for cost control:  there are too many hidden costs and loopholes that do little to improve the quality of care but that contribute significantly to making our health care twice as expensive as it is in other developed countries.  
 
One health care coverage issue that must be addressed in any reform proposal is the projection by the Medicare trustees that the Medicare Hospital Insurance trust fund (although not all of Medicare) will begin to run a shortfall in 2026.  A stable Medicare program is vital to all current and future seniors, yet too often discussions of health care reform ignore this looming instability in the program. All health care reform proposals must address this situation, but doing so is especially critical for advocates of expanding that very program, i.e., “Medicare for All.” 
 
We believe that health care is a moral issue.  Every human being deserves care when an accident or disease strikes; moreover, broad preventative health care measures underscore the positive value of mutual support within the human community. But health care resources are also finite, and we need to set some personal and societal limits on our health care expectations.  Setting those limits will entail some hard moral choices, but we can’t all have it all.  Health resources need to be shared among all members of our national community -- and the costs need to be shared by that community.  Insurance, carried by all, is one means of cost sharing, and government subsidies for insurance premiums for lower income families are essential to enable all to be insured.  We each have a responsibility to care for our own health, a right to receive care when we need it, and a responsibility to help care for others in their time of need.
 
Finally, we need to be prepared for a worst-case scenario:  if the courts rule the entire Affordable Care Act unconstitutional, we and all those who support the ACA will need to take action.  People’s lives will depend on it.
 
Good health care for everyone - It’s something we all want, but how do we get there?
 

[1] Kaiser Family Foundation Health Tracking Poll, April 2019:  www.kff.org/interactive/kff-health-tracking-poll-the-publics-views-on-the-aca/#?response=Favorable--Unfavorable&aRange=twoYear
 
pacg_health_care_reform_forum_statement_2019-2020_.pdf
File Size: 173 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File

pacg_health_care_reform_forum_statement_2019-2020_.docx
File Size: 94 kb
File Type: docx
Download File

0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Archives

    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    May 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    July 2015
    May 2015
    March 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    March 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    August 2012
    May 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    October 2011
    September 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2008
    September 2008
    August 2008
    July 2008

    Categories

    All
    2020 Platform Resolutions
    3 Actions 3 Days
    3 Actions - 3 Days
    3 Months
    3 Weeks
    Abortion
    Abortion Is Health Care
    Absentee Voting
    ACA
    ACA Enrollment
    ACLU
    Action Alert
    Adolescence
    Affordable Care Act
    African American History
    African History
    After Action Report
    A Message From The Board
    A Message From The President
    A Message From The Webmaster
    A Message To Our Membership
    Annual Picnic And Pie Auction
    Asylum
    Auto Theft Accountability Program
    Black History
    Black Lives Matter
    Board
    Book Club
    Books
    Candidate Questions
    Car Theft Accountability
    Caucus Training
    CDC
    Celebrating Earth Month
    Choice
    Citizens Advisory Panels
    Civil Disobedience
    Civil Rights
    Civil Rights Forum
    Civl Right
    Clergy For A New Drug Policy
    Climate Change
    Climate Crisis Voter
    Community Events
    Connection With Others
    COVID 19
    COVID-19
    COVID Relief
    Crisis At The Border
    DACA
    DAPL
    Davenport Bearing Witness
    Dick Fallow Endowment
    Donations
    Dreamers
    Dr. Kathleen Belew
    Drug Courts
    Drug Policy Forum
    Drug Policy Reform
    Drug Policy Reform Forum
    Duckworth
    Durbin
    Early Voting
    Earth Day
    Earth Month
    Earth Month Proclamation
    Earth Week
    Education
    Elections
    Environ
    Environment
    Environmental Forum
    Environmental Voter
    EPA
    Ernst
    Family Separation
    FARMERS MARKET
    Fundraising
    Gender
    Gender Equity
    Gender Equity Forum
    Global Climate Strike
    Government Shutdown
    Grants
    Grassley
    Green Drinks
    Green Holiday
    Green New Deal
    Gun Regulations
    Gun Violence
    Harm Reduction
    Health Care
    Health Care Reform Forum
    Hear Our Voice
    Holiday Party
    I Am The Future
    Illinois Local Government
    Illinois State Government
    Illiteracy
    Immigrants And Trafficking
    Immigration
    Impeachment Inquiry
    Inauguration 2021 Party
    Informed Voter
    Instagram
    Iowa Caucus
    Iowa Local Government
    Iowa State Government
    Iowa Women United
    Jobs
    Juvenile Justice
    Juvenile Justice Coalition
    Kavanaugh
    Kriss Wells
    Labor
    Leahy
    Legislative Forum
    Legislative Session
    LGBTQ+
    Lights For Liberty
    Living Lands And Waters
    Lobbying
    Local Culture
    LULAC
    Lunch & Learn
    Make Meds Affordable
    Marijuana Legalization
    Martin Luther King
    Mass Incarceration
    MCCQC
    Medical Cannabis
    Medicare
    Medicinal Canabis
    Membership Drive
    Members Of Congress
    Message From The Board
    Message From The President
    Message To Our Membership
    MLK Interpretive Center
    Monthly Environmental Celebration
    MoveOn
    Music
    NAACP
    Nahant Marsh
    National Organization For Women
    Native American
    Net Metering
    Networking
    Nobody Is Above The Law
    No Hate In Our States
    Nonbinary
    Nonviolent Resistance
    Novel Coronavirus
    No Wall
    Of Interest To Our Community
    Of Interest To PACG Forum Members
    One Human Family
    Op Ed
    Operation Reach Out
    Opioid Epidemic
    OSHA
    Our Office Manager
    Out & About
    PACG Action
    PACG Event
    PACG Events
    PACG History
    PACG In The News
    PACG Parties
    PACG's 15th Anniversary
    Pandemic
    Paris To Pittsburgh
    Paris To Pittsburgh Movie
    Partners Of Scott County Watersheds
    Peace Circle
    Peace Forum
    Peace & Justice
    Peace Vigil
    Picnic
    Pictures
    Power Of 3
    PPE
    Prescription Drug Pricing
    Pre-WEU Events
    Pride Fest
    Putnam Museum
    Quad Cities Interfaith
    Race And Trauma
    Race And Trauma (ART)
    Race: Are We So Different?
    Racial Equality Now
    Racial Justice
    Rallies
    Rapid Response Rallies
    Recycle
    Refugee Policy
    Refugees
    Renewable Energy
    Reproductive Rights
    Repurpose
    Resist
    Resistance School
    Resources
    Restorative Justice
    Restrictions To Voting
    Reuse
    Sanctuary
    Satellite Voting
    Save The Date
    Scott County Legislative Session
    Segregation
    Sentencing Reform
    Sexual Assault
    Social Justice
    Social Security
    Solar Power
    Special Counsel Investigation
    Spread The Relief Campaign
    Staff
    Standing With The Kurds
    Staying Informed
    Streaming Meetings
    Students
    Supreme Court
    Sustainable Farming
    Taking Action
    Taking Action 101
    The Many Faces Of Hate
    Toast The Resistance
    Transgender Rights
    Understand The Need
    Unitarian Church (UUCQC)
    Updated Post
    USPS Delivery Issues
    Volunteer Now
    Vote By Mail
    Vote-by-Mail
    Voter ID Laws
    Voter Registration
    Voter Suppression
    Voting
    Voting Rights
    Voting Rights Restoration
    War On Drugs
    Water Quality
    Water Sampling
    Webinar
    Weekly Email Update
    WEU Submissions
    What Is The White Power Movement?
    What You Can Do Now
    Wind Power
    Women's Equity
    Women's Equity Forum
    Women's History
    Women's Issues
    Workers' Rights
    Working Together Fund Drive
    Y15K
    Y15K Initiative
    Year End Summary
    Year-End Summary
    Youth
    Zoom
    Zoom Help
    Zoom Security

    RSS Feed

 Progressive Action for the Common Good (PACG)
 1212 W. 3rd St, Suite 3D, Davenport IA  52802    
 (563) 676-7580      
​ qcprogressiveaction@gmail.com                                                                                                                                      © 2023 Progressive Action for the Common Good